State v. D. B. O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the circumstances surrounding the repeated touching of the victim allowed a reasonable factfinder to make an inference that the youth acted with a sexual purpose
• concluding that the circumstances surrounding the repeated touching of the victim allowed a reasonable factfinder to make an inference that the youth acted with a sexual purpose
• noting that a “sexual purpose may be inferred even when the contact is brief and involves clothed intimate body parts, so long as that inference is reasonable in the context of all of the evidence”
• noting that a “sexual purpose may be inferred even when the contact is brief and involves clothed intimate body parts, so long as that inference is reasonable in the context of all of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. B. I. Z. V.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-05-30· cited 2×
• State v. K.-M. D. C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-27· cited 1×
• State v. C. G. P.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 1×
• State v. D. B. O.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-14

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 171×
• State v. Rodriguez/Buck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
• State v. Lerch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 87×
• State v. Fitch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-07-21· cited 9×
• State v. Saunders
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-12· cited 9×
• T. L. A. v. Vierra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-03· cited 6×
• State v. J. C. L.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-27· cited 3×