Skip to main content

State v. Currier

Citations

  • 148 N.H. 203
  • 808 A.2d 527
  • 2002 N.H. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Part I, Article 15 is “at least as protective of the defendant’s rights” as the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment of the Federal Constitution
  • recognizing violation of double jeopardy based on State’s indictment scheme
  • State’s overlapping indictment scheme violated defendant’s right to due process where indictments charged defendant with same offense in fact and in law
  • inadvertent exposure to pornography and sexual paraphernalia was not evidence of prior sexual activity under New Hampshire rape-shield law
  • inadvertent exposure to pornography and sexual paraphernalia was not evidence of pri- or sexual activity under New Hampshire rape-shield law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Burling, Dalianis, Groff, Nadeau, Rsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.