State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 154 N.E.3d 1115
- 2020 Ohio 3586
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening R.C. 2945.75 corrupting another with drugs Pelfrey jury verdict form degree of the offense mandatory fine. Although the jury verdict form did not state that the drug appellant furnished to the victim was heroin or specify the degree of appellant's offense of corrupting another with drugs, the jury verdict form did not run afoul of R.C. 2945.75 because heroin is not an \additional element\ contemplated by the statute. Appellant fails to demonstrate his counsel was ineffective in failing to file an affidavit of indigency before the trial court imposed a mandatory fine at his resentencing hearing.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. PelfreyOhio Supreme Court· 2007-02-07· cited 171×
- State v. EaffordOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 84×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 70×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 59×
- State v. EmersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-29· cited 8×
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.