Skip to main content

State v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4022

Syllabus

Promoting prostitution corrupting another with drugs sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight ineffective assistance of counsel Evid.R. 404(B) unfair prejudice. There was sufficient evidence to support promoting prostitution conviction where witness testified that appellant was directing her prostitution. There was sufficient evidence to support corrupting another with drugs conviction in violation of R.C. 2925.02(A)(2) where the appellant provided the victim with a deadly drug. We decline to address the manifest weight challenge where appellant fails to set forth an independent argument in support of this assignment of error. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a mistrial. The trial court did not err in overruling an objection to alleged \other acts\ testimony where a curative instruction was issued.

Judges: McCormack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.