State v. Cunningham
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4022
Syllabus
Promoting prostitution corrupting another with drugs sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight ineffective assistance of counsel Evid.R. 404(B) unfair prejudice. There was sufficient evidence to support promoting prostitution conviction where witness testified that appellant was directing her prostitution. There was sufficient evidence to support corrupting another with drugs conviction in violation of R.C. 2925.02(A)(2) where the appellant provided the victim with a deadly drug. We decline to address the manifest weight challenge where appellant fails to set forth an independent argument in support of this assignment of error. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a mistrial. The trial court did not err in overruling an objection to alleged \other acts\ testimony where a curative instruction was issued.
Judges: McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-13· cited 325×
- State v. NieldsOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 262×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 33×
- Parma Hts. v. OwcaOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.