South Dakota Supreme Court· 4/21/2004
State v. Cummings
Citations
- 2004 SD 56
- 679 N.W.2d 484
- 2004 S.D. LEXIS 63
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to apply the Hicks analysis to determine state jurisdiction in Indian land because “[b]y its own terms,” Hicks constrained its analysis to “[wjhether a tribal court rosy assert jurisdiction over civil claims” (emphasis partially omitted)
- refusing to apply the Hicks analysis to determine state jurisdiction in Indian land because “[b]y its own terms,” Hicks constrained its analysis to “[w]hether a tribal court may assert jurisdiction over civil claims” (emphasis partially omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sabers, Gilbertson, Konenkamp, Meierhenry, Zinter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 15×
- State v. SwalveSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-02-02· cited 9×
- Good Lance v. Black Hills Dialysis, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-11-04· cited 6×
- Hinkle v. AbeitaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-05-10· cited 4×
- State v. TullousSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 3×
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-06-24· cited 2×
- State v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-01-27· cited 2×
- Hinkle v. AbeitaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-06-19· cited 1×
- South Dakota v. CummingsSupreme Court· 2004-10-18
- State v. GatersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-09-20
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 1,006×
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 439×
- South Dakota v. Spotted HorseSupreme Court· 1991-05-13· cited 190×
- Atkinson Trading Co. v. ShirleySupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 156×
- State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-04-23· cited 59×
- State v. Spotted HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-10-04· cited 52×
- State v. HodgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 40×
- McDonald v. MeansNinth Circuit· 2002-08-14· cited 36×
- Benally. v. MarcumNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-09-10· cited 34×
- Macarthur v. San Juan CountyTenth Circuit· 2002-10-07· cited 26×
- In Re Hankins'petitionSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1964-01-30· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Old Elk v. District Court ex rel. County of Big HornMontana Supreme Court· 1976-07-08· cited 17×
- State v. OnihanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-03· cited 15×
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. South DakotaEighth Circuit· 1990-03-16· cited 15×
- State v. LupeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-15· cited 9×
- United States v. ArchambaultD. South Dakota· 2001-10-18· cited 9×
- Fidelity and Guaranty Ins. Co. v. BradleyW.D. North Carolina· 2002-07-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.