Skip to main content
· 3/15/1994

State v. Lupe

Citations

  • 889 P.2d 4
  • 181 Ariz. 211
  • 160 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 61
  • 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a state properly exercised jurisdiction for an offense committed outside the reservation by an Apache tribal member who was pursued into, and arrested within, the reservation
  • concluding that a state properly exercised jurisdiction for an offense committed outside the reservation by an Apache tribal member who was pursued into, and arrested within, the reservation
  • because tribe and state had not entered into an extradition agreement and tribe had not enacted laws regarding state’s authority to arrest members of tribe following close pursuit from state lands onto reservation, arrest did not interfere with tribal sovereignty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Claborne, Gerber, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.