Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 3/31/1992

State v. Cummings

Citations

868 S.W.2d 661
1992 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that relevant to partial consecutive service, a defendant with no prior criminal history had an extensive criminal history due to eight felony convictions in that case
holding that relevant to partial consecutive service, a defendant with no prior criminal history had an extensive criminal history due to eight felony convictions in that case
holding that relevant to partial consecutive service, a defendant with no prior criminal history had an extensive criminal history due to eight felony convictions in that case
concluding that a defendant with no prior criminal history but who pled guilty to eight offenses had an extensive criminal history that justified the imposition of consecutive sentencing
holding that the defendant, who had no criminal record other than his convictions in the case at issue, was an offender whose criminal record was extensive for consecutive sentencing purposes
affirming the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences based on the defendant’s current offenses as a record of extensive criminal activity despite the lack of a prior criminal record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Summers, Jones, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.