State v. Cuen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f we were to hold that the evidence of prior sexual misconduct in this case satisfies the criteria for admissibility under the . . . modus operandi exception, there would be nothing left of” the general prohibition in Rule 404(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cuen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-12· cited 33×
• Feld v. Gerst
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-29· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-02· cited 90×
• State v. Treadaway
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 68×
• State v. McFarlin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 66×
• State v. Jackson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-10-29· cited 30×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-01-17· cited 11×
• State v. Gibson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-07-12· cited 5×