State v. CSG Job Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, \a statute is to be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with its underlying purpose\ (citing In re Det. of Cross, 99 Wash.2d 373, 382, 662 P.2d 828 (1983))
• stating, “[A] statute is to be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with its underlying purpose” (citing In re Det. of Cross, 99 Wn.2d 373, 382, 662 P.2d 828 (1983))
• court should avoid strained, unlikely or unrealistic interpretations when construing a statute
• statutes should be interpreted so as to avoid absurd results
• statutes should be interpreted so as to avoid absurd results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).