District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/22/1996
State v. Crumpton
Citations
- 676 So. 2d 987
- 1996 WL 124693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- asking defendant if “he ‘minded’ coming over to the unit and telling the officer what he had placed in his pocket” did not constitute a seizure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazzara
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- State v. SimonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-04· cited 43×
- State v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-07· cited 24×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-03· cited 17×
- State v. SpurlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-06· cited 15×
- State v. StarkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-22· cited 15×
- State v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-13· cited 9×
- State v. JenkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-31· cited 5×
- State v. DeCoseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-18· cited 3×
- State v. BooneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.