Skip to main content

State v. Cross

Citations

  • 132 P.3d 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court asks whether the defendant's \representation has been irrevocably poisoned\
  • strategic disagreement between counsel and client regarding use of mental health defense did not demonstrate legally cognizable conflict requiring new counsel
  • “Multiple blows are strong evidence of premeditation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

91 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.