Skip to main content

State v. Crosby

Citations

  • 23 N.M. 461
  • 169 P. 303

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. In the prosecution for larceny of live stock, testimony as to certain brands on the cattle alleged to have been stolen, and without proof that the brands have been recorded, as required by statute, was admissible to establish the identity of the cattle. ■ P. 462</p> <p>2. Where there is substantial evidence to support a verdict the appellate court will not disturb it. P. 464</p>

Judges: Parker, Roberts, Tianna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.