Skip to main content

State v. Craft

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2045

Syllabus

Plain error; Evidence; Due Process; Polygraph Examination; Cumulative Error Doctrine; Merger. The trial court did not commit plain error by permitting evidence that defendant-appellant was asked to submit to a polygraph examination. The trial court did not commit plain error by permitting evidence that the defendant-appellant did not voluntarily provide law enforcement with the passcode to unlock his phone. Because the trial court did not commit multiple errors at defendant's trial, the cumulative-error doctrine does not apply. The trial court did not err by failing to merge defendant-appellant's convictions for felonious assault and discharging a firearm at or into a habitation.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.