State v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \this Court held that a flight instruction was appropriate in cases where the flight was unexplained and in cases where the flight has considerable probative value\
• evidence adequate to warrant flight instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dill v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-02-07· cited 155×
• State v. Jordan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-03· cited 29×
• State v. Holmes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-26· cited 23×
• State v. Abraham
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-07-24· cited 17×
• State v. Hicks
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-18· cited 16×
• State v. Beall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-23· cited 8×
• State v. Outlaw
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-12· cited 6×
• State v. Wright
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-09· cited 6×
• State v. Eason
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-25· cited 4×
• State v. Saez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-03· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Buonato
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-06-10· cited 22×
• State v. Cox
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-08-25· cited 13×
• Brennan v. Burger King Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-24· cited 12×
• State v. Cox
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-10-22· cited 1×