Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/16/1991

State v. Couture

Citations

218 Conn. 309
589 A.2d 343
1991 Conn. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

statements made while transporting stolen goods to safe hiding place were in furtherance of conspiracy
\The fourteenth amendment has long been held to forbid unequal treatment at the venire stage of jury selection\
claim of systematic exclusion failed for lack of sufficient evidence when defendant could have, but failed to, offer evidence that Jewish persons, in fact, postponed jury service because of Passover
fair cross section claim for lack of Jewish jury members failed for lack of sufficient evidence when defendant did not present evidence of number of Jewish persons residing in particular judicial district
amendment filed after the expiration of a statute of limitation which added allegations that the defendant was acting either willfully, wantonly and maliciously or, outside the scope of employment, does not constitute a new cause of action.
fair cross section claim failed for lack of sufficient evidence when defendant did not present evidence of “whether the representation of Jews in Waterbury panels of veniremen was fair and reasonable in relation to the number of Jews residing in the judicial district”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Santaniello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.