State v. Counterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding Rule 6(e) applies to extend the time period for answering a forfeiture complaint where service is completed by mail
• Rule 6(c) applies to extend the time period for answering a forfeiture complaint when service is completed by mail
• “Thus, the procedural rules for service of papers do not apply to service [under A.R.S. § 13-4307].”
• “If the time is triggered by the filing or mailing of the paper, Rule 6(e) does not apply; on the other hand, if the trigger point is service of the paper, Rule 6(e) does apply.”
• time extending provisions of civil procedure rules apply in civil forfeiture context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State ex rel. Brnovich v. Culver
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-06-07· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Brnovich v. Cisneros-Ruiz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-08-16· cited 3×
• Estate of Kearney v. 13th Jud. Dist
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-08-22
• In re In re
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-02-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Texie G. Carr v. The Veterans Administration, and J. G. Thompson
  Fifth Circuit· 1975-11-14· cited 80×
• Barassi v. Matison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-22· cited 69×
• Dioguardi v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-17· cited 18×
• Thielking v. Kirschner
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-07· cited 17×
• State v. Five Thousand Five Hundred & 00/100 Dollars ($5,500.00) in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-19· cited 9×
• Anderson v. Fidelity Southern Ins. Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-07-25· cited 7×
• Baker International Associates, Inc. v. Shanwick International Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-27· cited 6×
• Korens v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-07· cited 6×
• Smith v. Arizona Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-22· cited 3×