Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/11/2014

State v. Coulter

Citations

236 Ariz. 270
339 P.3d 653
701 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that testimony from the victim’s family member was sufficient for a jury to find an aggravating factor for emotional or financial harm
explaining that emotional harm under § 13-701(D)(9) includes “fright, fear, sadness, sorrow, despondency, anxiety, humiliation, depression (and other mental illnesses), and a host of other detrimental— from mildly unpleasant to disabling—mental conditions.”
describing “emotion” as “a state of feeling” and partially relying on witness testimony of her nightmares to uphold an emotional harm finding (citation omitted)
stating we sustain the finding of an aggravating factor if there is \substantial evidence to support\ it
\A statute is not vague simply because it is broad or that there may be difficulty in deciding whether certain marginal conduct falls within the scope of the statute.\
“A statute is not vague simply because it is broad or that there may be difficulty in deciding whether certain marginal conduct falls within the scope of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thumma, Downie, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.