State v. Cote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘unless a contrary interpretation would frustrate an evident legislative intent, criminal statutes are governed by the fundamental principle that such statutes are strictly construed against the state’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coats v. Dish Network, L.L.C.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 59×
• Seramonte Associates, LLC v. Hamden
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-10-18· cited 36×
• State v. Tabone
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 34×
• Envirotest Systems Corp. v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-09-08· cited 33×
• State v. Gupta
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-29· cited 27×
• State v. Fleming
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-25· cited 25×
• State v. Lamantia
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-09-03· cited 18×
• Director of Health Affairs Policy Planning v. Freedom of Information Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-25· cited 16×
• State v. Holloway
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-11-10· cited 10×
• State v. Dudley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-08-06· cited 10×
• State v. Boyd
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-07-07· cited 6×
• State v. Devon D.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-27
• State v. Apt
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-11-10
• State v. Lamantia
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-06-15
• Seramonte Associates, LLC v. Hamden (Concurrence)
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-10-18