Arizona Supreme Court· 11/24/1965
State v. Cota
Citations
- 99 Ariz. 233
- 408 P.2d 23
- 1965 Ariz. LEXIS 335
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A statute denies due process of law if it forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.\
- \A statute denies due process of law if it forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.\
- tracing common law origins of Tucson City Code § 11-28(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bernstein, Lockwood, McFarland, Struckmeyer, Udall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. HeinbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-22· cited 155×
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-05-09· cited 50×
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-03-22· cited 44×
- Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-07-03· cited 33×
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-01· cited 29×
- State v. LimpusCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-02-19· cited 28×
- State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 27×
- State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-17· cited 27×
- City of Phoenix v. FineCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-11-07· cited 24×
- Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-07-05· cited 15×
- State v. Direct Sellers AssociationArizona Supreme Court· 1972-03-06· cited 13×
- State v. CavittNebraska Supreme Court· 1968-03-08· cited 12×
- State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-10-08· cited 11×
- State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-10-01· cited 10×
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-09-26· cited 10×
- State v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-05-16· cited 9×
- State v. Herrera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-24· cited 9×
- Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-19· cited 8×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-25· cited 8×
- Cohen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-11· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,240×
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 896×
- United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 258×
- State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court· 1952-06-16· cited 105×
- Slusser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-12-21· cited 41×
- State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court· 1964-12-30· cited 31×
- Elfbrandt v. RussellSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 24×
- State of Arizona v. MendersonArizona Supreme Court· 1941-03-22· cited 20×
- Lovelace v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1957-09-27· cited 15×
- Elfbrandt v. RussellArizona Supreme Court· 1964-12-30· cited 14×
- Elfbrandt v. RussellArizona Supreme Court· 1963-05-01· cited 11×
- State of Arizona v. FarmerArizona Supreme Court· 1944-05-01· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.