State v. Costello
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3354
Syllabus
Appellant's sentencing challenge denied where his argument--that the trial court's imposition of a lengthy prison term fails to comport with the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12--is precluded by State v. Jones, 163 Ohio St.3d 242, 2020-Ohio-6729, 169 N.E.3d 649. Appellant's request that appellate court ignore binding precedent from the Ohio Supreme Court also rejected.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 1,234×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. Toles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-04· cited 92×
- State v. OrzechowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 34×
- State v. StensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-22· cited 10×
- State v. TatomOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-20· cited 9×
- State v. SzozdaOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.