Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/26/1999

State v. Corrado

Citations

972 P.2d 515
94 Wash. App. 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that although a judgment may be a nullity, for double jeopardy purposes the proceedings are not
stating that although a judgment may be a nullity, for double jeopardy purposes the proceedings are not
surveying decisions and concluding that delays of eight months to one year are typically the threshold for delays to be deemed presumptively prejudicial.
finding no prejudice where the defendant did not show prejudice to the third interest, limiting impairment to the defense case, but did show prejudice to the first two interests
a defendant’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial attach when a charge is filed or arrest is made, whichever occurs first
surveying several federal appellate decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.