Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/15/2000
State v. Cordova
Citations
- 8 P.3d 1156
- 198 Ariz. 242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating we do not reverse convictions or findings if they are supported by substantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Espinosa, Brammer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 206×
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-02· cited 125×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. LeBlancArizona Supreme Court· 1996-09-05· cited 110×
- State v. HattonArizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-06· cited 85×
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-18· cited 78×
- State v. WusslerArizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-01· cited 55×
- State v. TankersleyArizona Supreme Court· 1998-03-13· cited 52×
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-10-09· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. SterlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-26· cited 15×
- State v. SalmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-10-20· cited 12×
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-22· cited 10×
- State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.