State v. Corder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because the “accused shall enjoy the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the aecusation[,] ... a charge must be in a legally sufficient form which correctly advises the defendant about the allegations against him or her”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nesmith
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-04-12· cited 57×
• State v. Tominiko
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2011-08-26· cited 21×
• State v. Salvas
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2021-01-27

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Arceo
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 364×
• State v. Israel
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1995-02-27· cited 83×
• State v. Balanza
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-06-02· cited 78×
• State v. Reed
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 54×
• State v. Robins
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1983-03-16· cited 36×
• State v. Lagat
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-02-08· cited 33×
• Territory v. Kanda
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1957-02-14· cited 9×
• State v. Cadus
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 8×
• State v. Sugihara
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2003-04-02· cited 8×
• State v. Mitake
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1980-11-12· cited 4×