State v. Coppage
Citations
- 87 Kan. 752
- 125 P. 8
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 228
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Crime — Employer and Employee — Coercing an Employee to Make Agreement. An employer has no inherent right to coerce an employee, as a condition of remaining in his- employment, to make a written or verbal contract not to become or remain a member of a labor organization.</p> <p>2. Constitutional Law — Employer and Employee — Coercion of Employee. The legislature deeming such coercion against public policy violated no constitutional rights of employers in' the enactment of sections 4674 and 4675 of the General Statutes of 1909, and such sections are valid.</p>
Judges: Porter, Smith, West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1908-01-27· cited 323×
- Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-05-07· cited 27×
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-06-05· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Smith v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-06-07· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.