State v. Cope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• shoplifting under § 13-1805(A)(1) is a lesser included offense of organized retail theft under § 13-1819(A)(2)
• “[I]n order to avoid double jeopardy, it must be possible to violate one statute without violating the other.”
• “[I]n order to avoid double jeopardy, it must be possible to violate one statute without violating the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Prosise v. Hon kottke/state
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-09· cited 18×
• State v. Quijada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-28· cited 15×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-10-19
• State of Arizona v. Ronald David Castillo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-10-01

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Ohio v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
• State v. Anderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 191×
• State v. Harm
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-01-13· cited 179×
• State of Arizona v. Powers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-05-23· cited 93×
• State v. Chabolla-Hinojosa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-03· cited 77×
• State v. Siddle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-07-17· cited 51×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-28· cited 39×
• Taylor v. Sherrill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-24· cited 34×
• State v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-05-30· cited 32×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 16×
• Hernandez v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-19· cited 12×
• State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-01-29· cited 9×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-03-16· cited 7×