Skip to main content

State v. Cooper

Citations

  • 179 P.3d 439
  • 285 Kan. 964
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that though as a factual matter, paraphernalia must be present to manufacture methamphetamine, possession of paraphernalia is not an element of the crime of manufacturing methamphetamine
  • using drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine not identical to manufacturing methamphetamine notwithstanding that, conceptually, paraphernalia must be used to manufacture methamphetamine
  • \Manufacturing methamphetamine under K.S.A. 65- 4159[a] is not identical to using drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine under K.S.A. 65-4152[a][3].\
  • offense of manufacturing methamphetamine does not have the same elements as offense of using drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine; multiple punishments for the same conduct is constitutional so long as the crimes have different elements
  • offense of manufacturing methamphetamine does not have the same elements as offense of using drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine; multiple punishments for the same conduct is constitutional so long as the crimes have different elements
  • applying to K.S.A. 65-4152[a][3] and K.S.A. 65-4159[a]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen, Davis, Johnson, Greene, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.