Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 3/30/1995

State v. Coolidge

Citations

915 S.W.2d 820
1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the lack of any part of the record pertaining to sentencing requires the court to presume the sentence was correct
stating that “if the state action is remedial and not intended to inflict punishment as a means of vindicating public justice, the double jeopardy clause serves as no protection”
specifically stating that the absence of a portion of the record relating to sentencing requires the court to presume the sentence was correct
specifically stating that the absence of a portion of the record relating to sentencing requires the court to presume the sentence is correct
specifically stating that the absence of a portion of the record relating to sentencing requires the court to presume the sentence was correct
specifically stating that the absence of a portion of the record relating to sentencing requires the court to presume the sentence was correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Summers, Wade, Welles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.