Skip to main content

State v. Conley

Citations

  • 639 S.W.2d 435
  • 1982 Tenn. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a proceeding to have a defendant declared an habitual offender and to have his driving privileges revoked does not subject him to double jeopardy
  • holding revocation of driving privileges does not subject habitual offenders to double jeopardy
  • applying these quotes from Miles to determine that the revocation of driving privileges of one declared to be an habitual offender is “remedial in nature” within the meaning of double jeopardy
  • “[N]ot every deprivation visited upon one who violates the state’s laws is to be considered ‘punishment’ for purposes of applying the double jeopardy clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Cooper, Drowota, Fones, Harbi, Son

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.