State v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Corporation Commission’s penalty was “punishment” which barred a subsequent prosecution for the same conduct
• “‘[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause clearly prohibits a second proceeding to punish for the same conduct.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-08-03· cited 25×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• United States v. Winston Bryant McConney
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 1,819×
• Jones v. Thomas
  Supreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 434×
• Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. K N Energy, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1992-02-24· cited 70×
• United States v. Hall
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-01-05· cited 47×
• Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Medicine
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-27· cited 36×
• Taylor v. Sherrill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-24· cited 34×
• State v. Darby
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-03-13· cited 20×
• United States v. Constantine Walker
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 18×
• United States v. Valley Steel Products Co.
  Court of International Trade· 1990-01-11· cited 17×
• Mullet v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-03-19· cited 16×
• UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Neil T. NAFTALIN, Appellant
  Eighth Circuit· 1979-10-04· cited 13×