Skip to main content

State v. Cook

Citations

  • 9 S.W.3d 98
  • 1999 Tenn. LEXIS 682
  • 1999 WL 1211420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “that a defendant is not required to challenge a breath-alcohol test by filing a pretrial motion pursuant to Tenn. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3), but rather, may make a timely objection at trial if the prosecution has failed to establish the Sensing requirements”
  • The defendant, despite his having dentures, told the officer that he had nothing in his mouth.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Drowota, Birch, Holder, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.