Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/1/1993
State v. Coody
Citations
- 867 S.W.2d 661
- 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1867
- 1993 WL 499391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- merger doctrine is no longer a viable theory under the Missouri statutory scheme
- “We limit our review to matters raised in the points relied on.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montgomery, Parrish, Shrum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-05-30· cited 59×
- State v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-07-30· cited 17×
- State v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-08-14· cited 15×
- State v. SiminoMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-04-05· cited 8×
- State v. MendozaMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-07· cited 7×
- State of Missouri v. Vincent L. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-02-25
- RAMONE J. HICKS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-03-30
- State of Missouri v. Gary Andrews, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-02-23
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-01-31· cited 3,238×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-12-15· cited 533×
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1989-08-11· cited 434×
- State v. McMillinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-02-13· cited 215×
- State v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-06-14· cited 177×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-02-23· cited 155×
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1986-05-07· cited 128×
- State v. Villa-PerezSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-06-30· cited 114×
- State v. McTushSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-03-24· cited 88×
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri· 1986-11-18· cited 81×
- Roberts v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1986-11-03· cited 62×
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 50×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri· 1972-01-18· cited 38×
- Sebesta v. Kent Electronics Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-11-03· cited 30×
- State v. BogardMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 23×
- State v. HanesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-04-14· cited 20×
- State v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-25· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.