Skip to main content

State v. Comstock

Citations

  • 494 A.2d 135
  • 145 Vt. 503
  • 1985 Vt. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a chain of custody is sufficient where the evidence arrived at the lab through the mail in the same condition as when the officer prepared it, with seal intact, and where there was “no evidence of tampering with, change in, or confusion of the sample during the mailing”
  • finding breath test results “logically relevant to establish that defendant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor”
  • considering jury instructions in analyzing the defendant’s unfair-prejudice challenge to the admission of his BAG in an under-the-influence prosecution
  • stating in an analogous context that “[t]he purpose of the ‘reasonable grounds’ language ... is simply to require that a certain amount of evidence exist before an officer may take a breath test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.