State v. Colquitt
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2727
Syllabus
Appellant's constitutional right to a speedy trial following reversal and remand from his first appeal was not violated. Appellant was responsible for much of the delay, failing to appear at hearings and filing numerous motions and notices of appeal. Trial court did not err by not merging appellant's two failure to comply offenses and obstructing official business offense where each involved separate victims and separate identifiable harms.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- State v. KingOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 342×
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-14· cited 221×
- State v. BaileyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-14· cited 155×
- State v. TriplettOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-11· cited 98×
- State v. Long (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-11-24· cited 69×
- State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-25· cited 23×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-20· cited 16×
- State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-28· cited 9×
- State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-05· cited 6×
- State v. ColquittOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-12· cited 5×
- In re E.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 3×
- State v. RileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.