State v. Collins
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 646
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress evidence found on his cell phone. The challenged affidavit, despite being based primarily on hearsay evidence, was sufficient to ensure the issuing judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. Further, the trial court did not err in accepting appellant's no contest plea as it partially complied with Crim.R. 11 and appellant did not demonstrate prejudice. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2007-11-21· cited 185×
- State v. OjezuaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-19· cited 17×
- State v. PerdueOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-11· cited 17×
- State v. EasterOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-18· cited 14×
- State v. McGinnisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-01· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.