State v. Coleman
Citations
- 17 S.D. 594
- 98 N.W. 175
- 1904 S.D. LEXIS 10
Syllabus
<p>1. On trial of an indictment, the jury, under proper instructions, are the sole judges of the weight of the evidence.</p> <p>2. Where defendant, while in jail, handed a letter to one of his guards, with directions to deliver it to the addressee, and the defendant's brother and sister testified that it was in defendant’s handwriting, its genuineness was sufficiently proven to admit it in evidence for purpose of comparison of handwriting.</p> <p>3. Where defendant’s attorney, in cross-examining a witness, stated that a certain exhibit was the proved and admitted signature of the defendant and asked witness whether the same hand that signed it signed a certain paper in question, defendant could not rely on the objection that the exhibit was erroneously admitted because not proven genuine.</p> <p>4. On trial of indictment charging defendant with killing his brother, the motive alleged was a desire to procure insurance money. Deceased had taken out a life insurance policy for $5,000, of which defendant was named as beneficiary in a will alleged to have been executed by deceased. Defendant had taken out a similar policy, and executed a will therefor in his brother’s favor. Held, that a letter written by defendant, while in jail, to the state’s attorney asking him to send defendant his grip, which was found to contain the insurance policies and wills, was properly admitted in evidence.</p> <p>5. Medical examination sheets and certificates and applications for insurance, some purporting to be signed by deceased and some signed by defendant, were properly admitted under the state’s theory that defendant applied for insurance and executed the will in favor of his brother to induce him to do the same for defendant.</p> <p>6. On trial of an indictment charging defendant with killing his brother, in which the motive alleged was to secure the benefits of insurance on the life of the deceased, applications for further insurance, notes for premiums, and a will naming defendant a
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-01-05· cited 53×
- State v. FeuilleratSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-05-21· cited 31×
- State v. GerdesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-10-31· cited 30×
- State v. FergusonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1925-06-30· cited 28×
- State v. DanaheySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-03-17· cited 14×
- State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-11-20· cited 13×
- Mississippi Lumber & Coal Co. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1905-07-06· cited 7×
- Smith v. Mutual Cash Guaranty Fire Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1907-08-29· cited 7×
- Alderson v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. BeetsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1930-12-30· cited 4×
- State v. TrudellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1926-03-05· cited 2×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-15· cited 2,413×
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-10-30· cited 154×
- Kohl v. LehlbackSupreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 129×
- Carlton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-05-05· cited 79×
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1840-01-15· cited 60×
- Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1891-01-28· cited 58×
- Wassum v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-10-21· cited 45×
- Williams v. CongerSupreme Court· 1888-04-02· cited 35×
- Chase v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1866-04-15· cited 30×
- People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-03-30· cited 20×
- Wilson v. SeamanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-10-02· cited 19×
- State v. PhelpsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-06-13· cited 18×
- State v. HalpinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-08-13· cited 17×
- State v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1896-01-11· cited 14×
- Roseborough v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 13×
- Schoolcraft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-06-12· cited 13×
- State v. LindleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-06-20· cited 10×
- People v. SamselsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-11-14· cited 9×
- Petefish, Skiles & Co. v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1888-03-28· cited 6×
- United States v. RederU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota· 1895-08-22· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.