Carlton v. People
Citations
- 150 Ill. 181
- 37 N.E. 244
- 1894 Ill. LEXIS 1595
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal law — proof necessary to conviction. The proof of the charge in criminal cases involves the proof of two distinct propositions: First, that the act itself was done; and secondly, that it was done by the person charged, and by none other, — in other words, proof of the corpus delicti., and of the identity of the prisoner.</p> <p>2. Same — circumstantial evidence — its sufficiency. What circumstances amount to proof of an offense can liever be matter of general definition. The test is the sufficiency of the evidence to satisfy the understanding and conscience of the jury. It is sufficient if they produce moral certainty, to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt.</p> <p>3. In order to warrant a conviction of crime on circumstantial -evidence, the circumstances, taken together, should be of a conclusive nature and tendency, leading, on the whole, to a satisfactory conclusion, and producing, in effect, a reasonable and moral certainty that the accused, and no one else, committed the offense charged.</p> <p>4. Among the circumstances which may be judicially considered as leading to important and well-grounded presumptions, are motives to crime, declarations or acts indicative of guilty consciousness, or intentions and preparations for the commission of crime.</p> <p>5. Saxe — instruction as to circumstantial evidence. At the trial of a criminal case the court refused an instruction asked by the defendant, which was as follows: “The jury are instructed, as matter of law, that where a conviction for a criminal offense is sought on circumstantial evidence alone, the People must not only show, by a preponderance of evidence, that the alleged facts and circumstances are true, but they must be such facts and circumstances as are absolutely inconsistent, upon any reasonable hypothesis, with the innocence of the accused, and ineapable of explanation upon any other theory than that of the guilt of the accused; and in this case, if all the facts and circumstances r
Judges: Magruder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-01-30· cited 384×
- Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-04-17· cited 80×
- People v. LuederIllinois Supreme Court· 1954-09-23· cited 68×
- State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court· 1921-06-30· cited 65×
- People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court· 1916-12-21· cited 51×
- Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-05-10· cited 48×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1955-10-05· cited 43×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Vermont· 1922-01-05· cited 39×
- Henry v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-10-25· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-01-26· cited 37×
- Slack v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-12-16· cited 34×
- The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1934-02-23· cited 32×
- People v. CrowIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-10-18· cited 29×
- People v. SallowNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1917-06-15· cited 26×
- Hauser v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-06-23· cited 26×
- The People v. MartishuisIllinois Supreme Court· 1935-06-14· cited 25×
- The PEOPLE v. HansonIllinois Supreme Court· 1964-05-20· cited 24×
- People v. GormachIllinois Supreme Court· 1922-02-22· cited 24×
- The People v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court· 1929-02-20· cited 23×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-12-06· cited 22×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. CostleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1875-06-21· cited 128×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1846-06-15· cited 53×
- Miller v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1866-01-15· cited 48×
- Earll v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 32×
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 31×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1859-06-15· cited 31×
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1877-06-05· cited 28×
- Ackerson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1888-05-09· cited 23×
- Davis v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1885-05-15· cited 22×
- Otmer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-01-15· cited 16×
- State v. HaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1874-06-15· cited 11×
- Sam v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 11×
- Garrity v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1883-06-16· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. HearseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1804-10-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.