State v. Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accomplice liability statute’s requirement that the defendant intend his or her speech to aid a crime avoids prohibiting protected speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Embry
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-30· cited 58×
• State Of Washington v. Wallace Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-31· cited 55×
• State Of Washington, V Justin Michael Hart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-08-16· cited 25×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-09· cited 24×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-18· cited 22×
• State of Washington v. Steven David Stotts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-20· cited 22×
• State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-cross
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-11-28· cited 20×
• State Of Washington, V Russell David Homan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-15· cited 14×
• State v. McPherson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-24· cited 13×
• State v. Holcomb
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-04-10· cited 11×
• State v. Bergstrom
  Washington Supreme Court· 2022-01-27· cited 5×
• State of Washington v. Daniel Seth Arthur Holcomb
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-04-10
• State Of Washington v. Jeffrey Wayne Weller & Sandra Doreen Weller
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-18
• State Of Washington v. Justin Dewayne Mcpherson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-24

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brandenburg v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,379×
• State v. Kirkman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 747×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
• Virginia v. Hicks
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 643×
• United States v. Neal T. Roberts and James Albert Robison
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-05-07· cited 244×
• Noto v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 227×
• State v. Brockob
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 202×
• City of Seattle v. Huff
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 155×
• City of Seattle v. Webster
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-12-06· cited 87×
• State v. Gerdts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-17· cited 76×
• State v. Jessup
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-02-22· cited 46×
• State v. Renneberg
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 35×
• State v. O'DONNELL
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-27· cited 25×
• State v. Fredrick
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-08· cited 12×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-11-03· cited 10×
• State v. Ish
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-10· cited 5×
• In Re Marriage of Young and Remy
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-11-05· cited 2×