State v. Coleman
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2214
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress the robbery victim's show-up identification of defendant. The State presented sufficient evidence that defendant had an operable firearm during the robbery. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the admission of a gun and ammunition located 18 days after the robbery in the location where defendant had fled from the police. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 485×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. GrossOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-30· cited 235×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-07· cited 132×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 38×
- State v. MoodyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-23· cited 22×
- State v. MillionOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-20· cited 13×
- State v. PenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 9×
- State v. BatesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 8×
- State v. LauderdaleOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.