State v. Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the opportunity for meaningful judicial review is sufficient to satisfy due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zeimet
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-26· cited 27×
• Odegard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-06-16· cited 4×
• State v. Goharbawang
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-10-25· cited 3×
• State v. Omwega
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-07-21· cited 2×
• State v. Maas
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-07-01· cited 1×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2019-06-17

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thiele v. Stich
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-01· cited 1,003×
• United States v. Mendoza-Lopez
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 703×
• Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of Ramsey
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-13· cited 254×
• State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-17· cited 145×
• Matter of Blilie
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-01-22· cited 84×
• State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-08-29· cited 79×
• State v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-11-05· cited 14×
• In Re the Estate of Nordlund
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-12-14· cited 8×
• Freundschuh v. Freundschuh
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-02-11· cited 6×
• Kleven v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-01-13· cited 5×
• Rancour v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-02· cited 4×