Skip to main content
· 6/16/2009

Odegard v. State

Citations

  • 767 N.W.2d 472
  • 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 112
  • 2009 WL 1684490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Wiltgen established a new rule of constitutional criminal procedure and was subject to the general rule barring retroactive application
  • “[W]e review de novo a postconviction court’s legal conclusions, such as whether a decision applies retroactively.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stoneburner, Bjorkman, Muehlberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.