Skip to main content

State v. Cole

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 2821

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences resentencing res judicata. - Upon appeal after resentencing, defendant's argument that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences totaling 38 years was barred by res judicata because the appellate court affirmed the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences on defendant's direct appeal the limited remand after direct appeal for resentencing on two counts did not open the issue of consecutive sentences to further review after resentencing.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.