State v. Coffman
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1601
Syllabus
Appellant's right to counsel was not violated in his rape and sexual battery case because the record demonstrates that he was not rushed into pleading guilty. The record also demonstrates that appellant's plea was made in a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary manner. Finally, there was no evidence in the record that trial counsel was ineffective. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. SpatesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-20· cited 69×
- State v. DayOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 21×
- State v. MerrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-17· cited 14×
- State v. RoebuckOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-27· cited 5×
- State v. AcevedoOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-17· cited 3×
- BT Environmental Solutions, Inc. v. BT Energy Group, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.