Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/25/2022
State v. Cody
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 544
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's motion to suppress statements that he made to police and drugs found in a vehicle and on his person. Appellant was not in custody for Miranda purposes when he was asked about drugs in the vehicle, and the subsequently-discovered drugs on his person would have been inevitably discovered during a search incident to his arrest. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- State v. LozadaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-20· cited 98×
- State v. Banks-HarveyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 94×
- State v. Tidwell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-06-24· cited 58×
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. MoodyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-27· cited 12×
- State v. ToddOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-04-08· cited 9×
- State v. KlaseOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-23· cited 5×
- State v. FoxxOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.