New Mexico Court of Appeals· 11/12/1985
State v. Cobbs
Citations
- 711 P.2d 900
- 103 N.M. 623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing right to frisk is automatic when suspect has been stopped on the suspicion of committing or preparing to commit an inherently dangerous crime, like burglary
- noting that officer may conduct protective patdown search if there is reasonable suspicion that suspect has committed, is committing or will commit an “inherently dangerous crime”
- discussing 7 reasonable suspicion of persons on foot who entered a vehicle and drove away
- reviewing whether an officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a protective frisk
- “At best, when an officer is merely investigating a traffic offense, he faces an inordinate risk when he approaches a subject seated in an automobile.”
- reasonable for officer to frisk burglary suspect who may be armed with weapons or tools such as knives and screwdrivers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bivins, Minzner, Garcia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-05-23· cited 316×
- State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2003-10-01· cited 162×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-05-01· cited 129×
- State v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-27· cited 122×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-09-01· cited 110×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-06-30· cited 101×
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-07-02· cited 74×
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-06-08· cited 62×
- State v. PrinceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-09-07· cited 58×
- State v. BarraganNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-09-17· cited 55×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-06-10· cited 54×
- State v. PattersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-03· cited 46×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State Ex Rel. Taxation & Revenue Department Motor Vehicle Division v. Van RuitenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-28· cited 37×
- City of Albuquerque v. HaywoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 37×
- In Re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00)New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 35×
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
- People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-05-01· cited 33×
- State v. ArredondoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-15· cited 32×
- State v. LoweNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-05-03· cited 25×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-11-18· cited 388×
- Simmons v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1977-01-14· cited 61×
- State v. GalvanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-02-08· cited 59×
- State v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 55×
- People v. MylesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-08-04· cited 44×
- People v. LivigniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-08-23· cited 43×
- State v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-06-08· cited 32×
- United States ex rel. Richardson v. RundleThird Circuit· 1972-06-08· cited 24×
- State v. HilliardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-03-20· cited 18×
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-11-21· cited 14×
- People v. PittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-04-08· cited 12×
- State v. DecheneSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1975-02-06· cited 7×
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-12-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.