New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/8/1976
State v. Clokey
Citations
- 553 P.2d 1260
- 89 N.M. 453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the snatching of a victim’s purse was accompanied by sufficient force to create a question of fact for the jury
- determination of whether the defendant’s acts were accompanied by sufficient force to constitute robbery was factual issue to be resolved by fact finder
- “[W]e conclude that the evidence supported the verdict of the jury that the snatching of the purse was accompanied by force sufficient to convert the crime from larceny to robbery.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McManus, Oman, Montona, Sosa, Easley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PedroncelliNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-12· cited 37×
- State v. JamesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-11-02· cited 30×
- United States v. ManzanaresTenth Circuit· 2020-04-17· cited 30×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-09-21· cited 28×
- State v. CurleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-04-10· cited 27×
- United States v. GarciaTenth Circuit· 2017-12-18· cited 24×
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-12-23· cited 10×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-04· cited 3×
- United States v. KingD. New Mexico· 2017-03-31· cited 3×
- United States v. BarelaD. New Mexico· 2017-07-25
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.