Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/31/2018

State v. Clinton

Citations

2018 Ohio 3509

Syllabus

Trial court did not strictly comply with Crim.R. 11(C) because it completely failed to orally inform defendant of his constitutional right to require the state to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant's guilty plea was, therefore, invalid.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Garza
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-14
State v. Clinton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Boykin v. Alabama
Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
State v. Nero
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
State v. Engle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
State v. Veney
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
State v. Clark
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
State v. Barker
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.