State v. Cline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing trial court's decision that interview statement was made freely, voluntarily, and intelligently
• harmless constitutional error to admit statements made after invocation of right to silence when subsequent statements merely reiterated Cline’s earlier stoiy
• suspect’s invocation must be unambiguous, such that a reasonable police officer under the circumstances would understand the statement as an assertion of a Miranda right
• suspect's invocation must be unambiguous, such that a reasonable police officer under 21 the circumstances would understand the statement as an assertion of a Miranda right
• reviewing trial court’s conclusion statement freely, voluntarily, and intelligently made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Woods
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-01· cited 128×
• State v. Salary
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-03-13· cited 71×
• State v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-05-27· cited 39×
• State v. Aguirre
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-05-15· cited 28×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-01-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
• State v. Holmes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
• State v. Donesay
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 62×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-05· cited 52×
• State v. Oliver
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-16· cited 42×