Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/11/1992
State v. Clements
Citations
- 843 P.2d 679
- 252 Kan. 86
- 1992 Kan. LEXIS 188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a backrub, in context, could constitute sexual battery
- when motion in limine is denied, party must object to evidence at trial to preserve issue on appeal
- sexual battery and aggravated criminal sodomy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-12-11· cited 88×
- State v. PrineSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-16· cited 67×
- State v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 54×
- State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-16· cited 48×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 47×
- State v. TiffanySupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 32×
- State v. SynorackiSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-05-28· cited 28×
- State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-12-09· cited 22×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 15×
- State v. DayhuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-05-18· cited 11×
- State v. AcreeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-05-17· cited 7×
- State v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-04-09· cited 7×
- State v. SpurlockCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-08-23· cited 6×
- State v. LittriceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 4×
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-11-19· cited 3×
- Hunt v. LeeD. Kansas· 1998-09-29· cited 1×
- State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-04-04
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.