Connecticut Appellate Court· 2/9/1999
State v. Clay
Citations
- 51 Conn. App. 694
- 724 A.2d 1134
- 1999 Conn. App. LEXIS 38
- 1999 WL 55667
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- swallowing evidence sufficient to conceal or destroy evidence within meaning of evidence tampering statute
- swallowing evidence sufficient to conceal or destroy evidence within meaning of evidence tampering statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spallone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Tennessee v. Ledarren S. HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 209×
- State v. GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-11· cited 19×
- People v. BrakeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-01-27· cited 15×
- State v. WidlakConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-09-14· cited 3×
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-14
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-10· cited 99×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 59×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-30· cited 46×
- State v. MirandaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-14· cited 16×
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-06· cited 10×
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-09· cited 10×
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-06-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.