Supreme Court of New Jersey· 3/22/1971
State v. Clark
Citations
- 275 A.2d 137
- 58 N.J. 72
- 1971 N.J. LEXIS 228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding both Fifth Amendment and public policy require that neither unmarried welfare applicant nor father of her children could be prosecuted for fornication where applicant was required to institute bastardy proceedings against father to obtain benefits
- holding both Fifth Amendment and public policy require that neither unmarried welfare applicant nor father of her children could be prosecuted for fornication where applicant was required to institute bastardy proceedings against father to obtain benefits
- holding both Fifth Amendment and public policy require that neither unmarried welfare applicant nor father of her children could be prosecuted for fornication where applicant was required to institute bastardy proceedings against father to obtain benefits
- involving welfare, bastardy and police proceedings
- involving welfare, bastardy and police proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Francis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- State v. P.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-11-26· cited 145×
- R.A.C. v. P.J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-07-17· cited 41×
- DCPP VS. S.K. AND C.K., IN THE MATTER OF JE.K. AND JA.K. (FN-04-0619-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-08-31· cited 36×
- Moore v. HafeezaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-07-29· cited 31×
- Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-11-19· cited 30×
- District of Columbia v. GarciaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-04-01· cited 23×
- State v. ReldanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-02-14· cited 10×
- State v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-01-26· cited 8×
- State v. P.Z.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-11-13· cited 6×
- W.S. v. X.Y.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-05-30· cited 6×
- Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1974-07-24· cited 5×
- R.A.C. v. P.J.S.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-08-31· cited 5×
- State v. SaundersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-09-27· cited 4×
- Levin v. LevinNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-06-20· cited 4×
- Williams v. Trans World AirlinesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-05-06· cited 3×
- State v. County of HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-06-15· cited 3×
- State of New Jersey v. Daniel A. BorjasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2014-07-08· cited 3×
- Essex County Division of Welfare v. WalkerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-10· cited 3×
- State Farm Indemnity Co. v. WarringtonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-04-26· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- King v. SmithSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 1,272×
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 703×
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-06-28· cited 157×
- In Re CagerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-12-03· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. LucianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-04-15· cited 11×
- Rohrheimer v. WintersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-05-06· cited 11×
- MacE v. JungAlaska Supreme Court· 1963-11-06· cited 10×
- Hanes v. HanesTexas Commission of Appeals· 1921-12-07· cited 4×
- People v. MunozCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-12-08· cited 2×
- County of Contra Costa v. Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-09-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.